News

2/18/11

Japan will cut short this year’s annual whale hunt in the Antarctic Ocean after obstruction by an environmental group largely prevented its ships from killing whales, the government said Friday.

The Agriculture Ministry, which runs Japan’s widely criticized research whaling program, said harassment by the group, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, had kept its catch far below its annual target of whales. A spokesman for the ministry said on Friday that 170 minke whales and two fin whales had been caught this season, far below the annual targets of 850 minke and 50 fin.

The recall of Japan’s fleet is the first time that environmentalists have succeeded in cutting short the annual hunts, which Japan says are necessary for scientific research. Critics say the hunts are an effort to evade a global moratorium on commercial whaling.

Friday’s announcement was welcomed by Sea Shepherd, which is based in Washington State. In a statement on its Web site, the group said three of its ships would remain in the Southern Ocean to “escort” the Japanese fleet northward.

In recent years, Sea Shepherd has sent ships to the Antarctic to block Japan’s whaling fleet, turning the hunts into a game of cat-and-mouse that has received increasing media attention. The environmentalists try to block the Japanese by tangling the ships’ propellers with ropes or putting their own vessels in between the whalers and their quarry.

The ministry said the group had harassed the Japanese ships by shining laser beams to temporarily blind crew members and throwing flares onto the whaling vessels. Agriculture Minister Michihiko Kano told reporters on Friday that the decision to recall the fleet was made to ensure the safety of the crews and ships.

The ministry said its whaling fleet had often been able to simply outrun the environmentalists. It could not do so this year because Sea Shepherd had faster vessels, the government said.

Japanese newspapers reported that there had been resistance to cutting short the hunt for fear of appearing to cave in to pressure from foreign environmentalists.

Domestic critics have called the program an anachronism, because private fishing companies have dropped out under international pressure and the demand for whale meat is declining. Few Japanese eat whale anymore, and the meat from the hunt has piled up in freezers, or been given to children for school lunches.

Read Full Article

2/17/11

After almost two hours of discussion Monday night, the Fort Bragg City council agreed to have the Mendocino Solid Waste Management Authority prepare an environmental impact report for a draft ordinance regulating single-use plastic carryout bags.

City Manager Linda Ruffing noted that the Public Works & Facilities Committee met Jan. 13 to review a draft ordinance, intended to reduce waste and litter generated by small plastic bags used to carry merchandise from stores. It is also intended to promote the use of reusable cloth bags.

According to staff reports, costs would be limited to city attorney review and associated staff expenses and fines for violations could be used to offset enforcement costs.

The committee also recommended that a 10-cent charge be applied to some paper bags so retailers could cover the cost of providing them. However, it has yet to be determined how small a paper bag would have to be in order to avoid that charge. Fast food outlets typically offer drive-up food in paper and plastic bags of varying sizes. MSWMA Manager Mike Sweeney said the city would need to decide if exemptions would apply to some outlets or if the ordinance would apply equally to all.

Sweeney came to the meeting with a collection of plastic bags from around the city and said litter is the foremost problem with them. He estimated that bags from Safeway make up about half of those found locally, but also showed bags from other stores. He said plastic bags now make up about 25 percent of all litter. Showing a decrepit Walmart plastic bag, he noted that plastic does not biodegrade, but falls apart and typically ends up in the ocean.

Another problem with plastic bags is the waste of resources, he said, and the bag industry uses a lot of petroleum and energy to create disposable things.

Cities ban together

Sweeney called San Jose's ordinance exceptional, noting that its authors had looked at, and included, every conceivable negative impact caused by plastic bags. He said Fort Bragg can benefit greatly from the work of the other cities. Sweeney felt the ordinance could be generated quickly.

Vice Mayor Meg Courtney said that during her informal survey of retailers, most grocers said they would be happy to see plastic bags banned. She said some questioned having a 10-cent charge for paper bags until she explained that the retailer would keep the charge to cover its costs for offering them.

Sweeney explained later that the idea is not to replace plastic with paper bags, but to incentivize the use of reusable cloth bags.

Read Full Article

2/18/11

Talk about a quick learner: in just 50 years, a fish has evolved a resistance to toxic chemicals polluting its Hudson River home, a new study finds. 

Between 1947 and 1976, roughly 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, were dumped in the Hudson by two General Electric facilities. The Atlantic tomcod, a small bottom-feeding fish, quickly accumulated high levels of the toxic compounds, which caused lethal heart defects in juveniles of the species.

Then, natural selection took over. In a matter of decades, a rare genetic mutation that allowed a small number of tomcod to tolerate PCB contamination spread through the broader population, allowing the species to thrive, scientists concluded after a four-year study.

“We think of evolution as something that happens over thousands of generations,” Isaac Wirgin, a population geneticist at New York University and the study’s lead author, said in a statement. “But here it happened remarkably quickly.”

Documented instances of rapid evolution in response to environmental contamination are quite rare, Dr. Wiggin said.

The tomcod had long been known for its remarkable tolerance to PCB pollution, but the biological mechanism responsible for its survival was unclear until now. Researchers found that a mutation to just one gene effectively blunted the chemical’s toxic effects, and that fish with the mutation survived and reproduced while those without it died off.

The study appears in the journal Science this week.

Read Full Article

2/7/11

CRESCENT CITY, Calif.—An unexpectedly large run of salmon in the rivers of far Northern California this winter is providing an economic boost to local communities across the hard-hit region.

After years of declining fish numbers, some waterways, including the Smith River—which flows through giant redwoods into the Pacific Ocean near Crescent City—have seen their best salmon returns since the 1970s, according to the California Department of Fish and Game and local biologists.

That is jump-starting the business for guides like Ken Cunningham, who lives near this town of 7,500 and fishes for salmon from a small boat drifting downriver. The 63-year-old said he spent about 20 days guiding last October at the height of the run, compared with about 10 days in October 2009. At $250 to $350 a trip, depending on the number of people, Mr. Cunningham made more than $5,000 in October.

The revival of freshwater recreational fishing is especially important for areas like Crescent City, which 30 years ago was a booming forestry and commercial-fishing town. "It was a very different community. There was a lot of economic activity," said Richard Young, the Crescent City harbor master and a former commercial fisherman.

The Rowdy Creek Fish Hatchery on a Smith tributary, for one, counted 3,538 salmon this winter, compared with 2,775 last year and 589 in 2006. The nearby Trinity River hatchery's fall and winter salmon runs totaled 12,002, up from 9,983 a year earlier. To the south, a hatchery on the Feather River reported more than 17,000 returning adult salmon during the recent run, compared with 6,234 a year earlier.

The teeming fish runs are a turnabout from years of decline, when salmon populations were affected by dams, low rainfall and logging, which can smother salmon spawning areas with dirt. Although no one is sure why so many salmon returned this winter, some hatchery managers and others speculate heavy rain and favorable ocean conditions helped the healthy returns.

Scientists say salmon remain imperiled, and that some fish populations in California are extinct or nearing extinction. They are still trying to figure out what makes the populations fluctuate.

What is clear is that this winter's huge salmon runs have drawn legions of fishermen, creating business for fishing guides, tackle shops and motels in many small towns in the region. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimated anglers in California made $2.7 billion in fishing-related expenditures in 2006, the most recent year for which data are available.

On remote Smith tributaries, a nonprofit group this winter offered tourists trips to see spawning fish. In drought years, some of those tributaries don't have enough water for salmon to spawn.

"It's huge for us to have a big population of fish, for our economy," said Zack Larson, a local biologist who has also worked as a fishing guide.

Still, Andy Van Scoyk, who runs the Rowdy Creek Fish Hatchery, said there was reason for concern. While this winter's run was large, he said, its small proportion of juvenile fish points to a potentially weak run next winter.

Read Full Article