News

12/8/12

An Alaska senator wants $15 million for tsunami debris cleanup on the West Coast included in a federal disaster relief pack­age for states affected by Superstorm Sandy.



Sen. Mark Begich said it’s embarrassing that the government of Japan has put more funding toward the debris cleanup than the U.S. govern­ment has. He said the impact of debris from the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan reaching U.S. shores is as much a natural disaster as a hur­ricane, drought or wildfire — it’s just unfolding in slow motion.



“We have to recognize that it’s different than any other type of disaster because if it’s like Sandy, you see it; it’s right there in your face, everything at once,” he said. “And in this situa­tion it’s kind of like climate change. Things don’t happen overnight, they happen over a period of time, and when it happens and accumulates you look back and say, ‘Why didn’t we do some­thing?’ “We have that option right now to do some­thing,” he said.



Japan has pledged $5 million for tsunami debris cleanup, more than the entire National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration budget for dealing with marine debris in gener­al in fiscal year 2012. Begich said he considers a three-to-one match of the Japanese funding “the very least” the federal government can do to help cleanup efforts in Alaska, Hawaii, Califor­nia, Oregon and Washington.



It’s not clear just how quickly Congress will take up the aid package, or how big it might be. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, said he hasn’t taken a position yet on how much money may be needed for debris cleanup. “There are significant discussions yet to be had but I agree that there is a need for funds to help mitigate the effects of tsuna­mi debris impacting our shores,” he said in a state­ment.

Some states haven’t yet used their $50,000 grants provided by NOAA earlier this year. In Washington state, for example, after see­ing an increase in debris from May through July, offi­cials say things have quieted down and the state’s plan for dealing with the debris calls for conserving resources where possible. NOAA announced the grants to the five West Coast states in July.

In Alaska, the grant’s gone, having gone toward cleanup along 25 miles out of about 2,500 in the state before the weather turned too nasty for crews to be out. The work was done by Gulf of Alaska Keeper, which is dedicated to cleaning marine debris from the Alaska coastline. Moni­toring by the group found a huge jump in the weight of debris found at four sites it regularly visits.

“It’s just devastating, just sick,” said the group’s presi­dent, Chris Pallister, who worries about the impact of the debris on fish and wildlife.

Tsunami debris is difficult to monitor, given that debris can break up and winds and ocean currents consistently change. And it’s tough to dis­tinguish it from the everyday debris that has been an ongoing problem for coastal communities for years. At least 16 items from among more than 1,400 reports have been firmly traced to the tsunami, including a 20­foot boat, pieces of which were recovered earlier this month in Hawaii.

The Japanese government estimated that 1.5 million tons of debris were floating in the ocean in the immedi­ate aftermath of the tsunami, but it’s not clear how much is still floating nearly two years on or just what will U.S. shores, when.

NOAA estimates the bulk of what is coming either has arrived or will in the next year or so — but that’s a rough guess. The Japanese government last month pre­dicted the most buoyant debris, such as buoys that lit­tered some Alaska beaches earlier this year, has already arrived. Lumber from hous­es and boats is expected to begin reaching the West Coast around this month, and mostly submerged debris, like driftwood or waterlogged lumber, is expected around June next year.

In Oregon, after a fairly normal year for debris — save for the massive dock that washed ashore from Japan — a recent storm brought foam and other rubbish onto isolated sec­tions of shoreline, said Chris Havel, spokesman for the state’s Department of Parks and Recreation. State response teams were also recently activated to dispose of a gas can that washed up.

Havel shares Pallister’s concerns about the environ­mental impact of debris as it breaks up. Unlike in Alaska, where beaches are often remote and treacherous dur­ing the fall and winter, beaches in Oregon are large­ly accessible year-round, and Havel was placing orders earlier this week for another 10,000 bags that will be used in cleanup. He placed his last order in July, but anticipates needing more as the winter wears on.

“We do need resources now, people and money now, to deal with it here at the beginning of a two- to three-year effort,” he said.

Read Original Article

11/30/12

The Government of Japan announced today a gift of $5 million to the United States, through NOAA’s Marine Debris Program, to support efforts in response to marine debris washing ashore in the U.S. from the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
The funds will be used to support marine debris response efforts, such as removal of debris, disposal fees, cleanup supplies, detection and monitoring. NOAA anticipates distributing funds to affected regions as the funds are received from Japan and will work to determine immediate needs and plan for future applications.

Since the disaster, NOAA has been leading efforts with federal, state and local partners to coordinate a response, collect data, assess the debris and reduce possible impacts to natural resources and coastal communities.

“We are extremely grateful to Japan for its generous support to the American people. The tragedy set in motion by the earthquake and tsunami continues to be tangible, but it brought our nations together. This gift is a powerful reminder of the goodwill, friendship and spirit of mutual support between our people,” said Jane Lubchenco, PhD., under secretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and administrator of NOAA. “We appreciate this partnership and collaboration with Japan as we work to keep our ocean and coasts healthy.”

Debris from the disaster has drifted across the Pacific and reached shorelines in the U.S. and Canada. In July, NOAA provided $50,000 each to Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon and California to support response efforts.

Items from the tsunami that have drifted to U.S. shores include sports balls, a floating dock, buoys and vessels. Mariners and the public can help report debris by emailing This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with information on significant sightings. For the latest information on tsunami debris please visit: Japan Tsunami Marine Debris.

NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Visit us at www.noaa.gov.

Contraceptives and antidepressants can reduce fish reaction times and reproductive rates

11/16/12

Scientists have known for years that human medications, from anti-inflammatories to the hormones in birth-control pills, are ending up in waterways and affecting fish and other aquatic organisms. But researchers are only beginning to compile the many effects that those drugs seem to be having. And it isn't good news for the fish.

One such drug, fluoxetine, is the active ingredient in the antidepressant Prozac. Like some other pharmaceuticals, fluoxetine is excreted in the urine of people taking it, and reaches lakes and waterways through sewage-treatment plants that are unequipped to remove it.

To investigate the effects of fluoxetine, researchers have turned to a common US freshwater fish species called the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Normally, fathead minnows show a complex mating behavior, with males building the nests that females visit to lay their eggs. Once the eggs are laid and fertilized, the males tend to them by cleaning away any fungus or dead eggs.

But when fluoxetine is added to the water, all of this changes, said Rebecca Klaper, an ecologist at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee's Great Lakes Water Institute. Klaper presented her results this week at the 2012 meeting of the North American division of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry in Long Beach, California.

Female fathead minnows seem to be unaffected by the chemical, but at concentrations of fluoxetine that are roughly comparable to the highest levels documented in fresh water, male minnows start to spend more time building their nests. When the dose is increased tenfold, the males "become obsessive, to the point they're ignoring the females", Klaper said.

When fluoxetine concentrations are increased yet again, fathead reproduction completely halts. "The males start killing the females," she said. Klaper also noted that if females are introduced a month after males are exposed to the chemical, the males no longer show this aggressive behavior, but the females still don't lay any eggs. "Something happens in that time," she said.

Easy prey


Reproductive behavior isn't the only thing that can be affected by trace pharmaceuticals. At the same symposium, Dan Rearick, an aquatic toxicologist from St Cloud State University in Minnesota, reported that a chemical found in birth-control pills, 17-β-estradiol, reduced the ability of fathead minnow larvae to elude predators.

After exposing the larvae to estradiol, Rearick then subjected them to sudden vibrations, similar to those produced by approaching predators. Using high-speed videos, he measured how long it took the minnows to curve their bodies into a C shape — an escape behavior known as a C-start. "They are preparing to dart away," he explained. He found that, even at environmental levels of estradiol (20 or 100 nanograms per liter), the minnows' reaction time was significantly slowed compared to control larvae that had not been exposed to estradiol.

In a second experiment, he raised hundreds of estradiol-exposed and control larvae, and repeatedly put ten larvae from both groups together in a tank with a predator, a bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). When half of the larvae in each experiment had been eaten, Rearick looked at which types of larvae were left.

The result agreed with the C-start experiments: of the surviving fish, only about 45% were from the estradiol-exposed group, with the majority of survivors coming from the control group (55%).

Population crash


That difference might not sound like much, but using a multi-generation population biology model, Rearick found that it would be enough to produce a rapid population crash in the estradiol-exposed fish. Even if the fish weren't as badly affected, there would still be a slow, steady decline, he found. "There is probably a need for concern," he said.

Read More

Poor test results push Dungeness crab commercial opening to Dec. 16 at the earliest

11/15/12



Poor test results mean a delayed com­mercial crab season for local fishermen in Humboldt, Mendocino and Del Norte counties that won’t start until at least Dec. 16.

According to a notification from Department of Fish and Game Director Charlton Bonham, poor crab meat-to­size ratios in recent tests indicate that crabs will not be ready for harvest on Dec. 1, the original opening date for the season.



Crab fisherman Aaron Newman, Humboldt Fisherman’s Marketing Association president, said he is viewing the decision as a positive.

“It just means we have to sit tight and wait for the crabs to get bigger,” he said. “There have been quality tests indicating that the crabs are way under marketable standards right now. We just need to wait till the numbers get up there.”

Crabs must have a ratio of 25 per­cent meat recovery to the gross weight of the crab in order to meet harvesting standards.

In Eureka and Crescent City, crab tests showed an average meat recovery of 15.5 percent during the first round of testing in late October. The results improved slightly to 16.1 percent in Crescent City and 16.7 percent in Eure­ka by the first week of November, but not enough to prevent a delay in the commercial season. Poor results are also causing a delay for fishermen in Oregon and Washington.

DFG environmental scien­tist Pete Kalvass said a third round of testing is expected to be done in two weeks, at which point, managers will determine if the season should open Dec. 16 or be further delayed. Another option is separate opening dates, depending on individ­ual test results seen in differ­ent areas.

Kalvass said local commer­cial fishermen shouldn’t hold their breath for better results from the next round of testing.

“It’s a high probability the season is going to be delayed beyond those two weeks,” he said.

A number of factors, including competition for food, can contribute to low ratios seen along the North Coast, Kalvass said. Last sea­son, the opening date was pushed back to Jan. 16. Kalvass said that doesn’t mean it will be a problem next year.

“We aren’t seeing a trend on this,”Kalvass said.“At least not yet.”

ON THE WEB:

The most recent commercial crab news, including test results and season start date notifications, can be found on the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission website at www.psmfc.org/crab/.

Read Original Article