Humboldt Waterkeeper
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Waterkeeper Alliance
  • Humboldt Bay
    • Geography
    • Wildlife
    • Bay Issues
    • Photo Gallery
  • Programs
    • Toxics Initiative
    • Water Quality
    • Bay Tours
    • Community Outreach
  • Get Involved
    • Report Pollution
    • Speak Out
    • Volunteer
    • Donate
    • Membership
    • Stay Informed
  • Contact Us
  • News
    • Latest
    • Press

Latest

 

Report highlights California's huge 'wave power' potential

Details
Dana Hull, San Jose Mercury News
Latest
Created: 22 January 2012

1/19/12

A new report by the Department of Energy says that waves off California's 1,100-mile coastline could generate more than 140 terawatt hours of electricity a year -- enough to power 14 million homes -- if tidal and wave energy was developed to its maximum potential.

 

The United States uses about 4,000 terawatt hours of electricity a year; 1 terawatt hour powers about 100,000 American homes.

 

"California's wave and tidal current resources offer real opportunities to generate renewable energy using water-power technologies in the future," Energy Secretary Steven Chu said in a statement.

 

Wave energy uses a variety of devices placed in the ocean to generate electricity, but the technology has not been widely used in the United States. The Department of Energy is sponsoring three demonstration projects off the coast of Oregon, in Washington's Puget Sound area and in Maine.

 

Currently, California has no wave energy project up and running, but the California Ocean Protection Council says one project off the coast of San Onofre has received a preliminary permit. The permitting process is complex and involves several federal and state agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

 

"Wave energy projects have a very low profile -- much lower than a wind turbine," Mike Reed, team leader for water-power technologies at the Department of Energy, said in an interview. "The devices are located two to three miles off shore -- you can't see them from the shore."

 

Pacific Gas & Electric last year suspended its Humboldt WaveConnect Project, a pilot project off the coast of Humboldt County, amid opposition from some environmentalists and concerns about the lengthy permitting process, escalating costs and feasibility. Many Humboldt County environmentalists opposed WaveConnect over concerns that it would damage local fisheries and marine ecology. 

 

The Energy Department's Water Power Program is trying to quantify the nation's potential water-power resources so that investors, developers and policymakers can make decisions about where to place them.

Read More

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Crab season starts Sunday

Details
Donna Tam, Times Standard
Latest
Created: 14 January 2012

1/14/12

After waiting weeks for the season to begin, commercial crab fishermen were allowed to drop their traps into the water Friday at noon.

 

Dozens of boats loaded with crab pots headed out to sea on Friday morning, and crab is expected to show up on docks on Sunday.

 

Eureka crab fisherman Scott Creps said fishermen will be waiting on the water at midnight Sunday to pull up their catch.

 

”It's been a month and a half -- everybody's really anxious to get going,” he said “We've got a good price to get started with.”

 

DFG senior marine biologist Pete Kalvass said crab samples tested last weekend finally showed crabs from all ports on the North Coast -- including Eureka and Trinidad -- meeting the minimum standards for the season. Although the season normally starts Dec. 1, early results showed that the crabs weren't meaty enough, delaying the season. Crabs must be 25 percent meat to reach the threshold.

 

Creps said fishermen have been offered $3 a pound, a substantial increase from last year's price of $1.75 a pound.

 

The delayed market may have played a role in the price.

 

The season has already opened in the San Francisco Bay Area, where parties agreed to a price of $2.25 a pound in late November after a two-week bargaining delay.

 

 

Read More 

 

A Defender of World’s Whales Sees Only a Tenuous Recovery

Details
Christina Russo, Yale Environment 360
Latest
Created: 11 January 2012

12/11/11

 

Roger Payne first came to prominence more than 40 years ago, when he and a colleague made the discovery that whales sing eerily beautiful songs as a way of communicating. Their 1970 recording of whale sounds, Songs of the Humpback Whale, helped to galvanize the global anti-whaling movement, which led most countries to scrap their whaling fleets.

 

Payne, the founder of the conservation group, Ocean Alliance, has continued his groundbreaking work on whales, including recent landmark studies showing how whales worldwide have high levels of pollutants — including DDT — in their bodies. He also is continuing a 40-year study of more than 2,000 right whales in Argentina, identifying individual whales by the markings on their heads.

 

In an interview with Yale Environment 360 contributor Christina Russo, Payne talked about current threats to the world’s whale populations, including the ongoing killing of whales by Japan and other nations — a practice he describes as inhumane. Payne also discussed the mystery of the songs sung by whales, whose haunting strains have the power, he says, to move people to tears.

 

Yale Environment 360: You’ve been studying whales for nearly half a century?

 

Roger Payne: Yes. I’ve been studying whales about 45 years.

 

e360: Do you ever come across educated, aware people who don’t realize that whaling is still taking place?

 

Payne: I would say most of them don’t realize it. And if they do realize that whaling is taking place, they are very pleased that there is a moratorium and that whaling is under control. And of course the truth of the matter is that whaling is completely under the control of the whalers — not the rest of the world. The rest of the world gets no chance to vote on it, even discuss it, set up any quotas or anything else. The whalers have won absolutely everything.

 

e360: When you first started studying whales in the 1960s, the chief threat to them was commercial whaling. About 33,000 great whales at that time were killed annually. The 1986 moratorium made a huge impact. But Norway, Iceland and Japan — among others — still whale. How many whales are killed now annually?

 

Payne: The numbers have been climbing steadily since the moratorium went into effect. At that time the total number killed was 185 whales. Two years ago it was 1,004.

 

 

Read More

 

Government should not be subsidizing GE salmon

Details
Jared Huffman for the Times Standard
Latest
Created: 10 January 2012

12/21/11

Aan angler who has fished North Coast salmon streams for many years, I’m pleased that we are having relatively strong salmon returns this year. If nature cooperates with normal rainfall and good ocean conditions, and if we continue to invest in habi­tat restoration, we should see a meaningful improvement to our beleaguered salmon populations in the next few years. For the North Coast, that means more than just good news for the environ­ment; it means jobs.

But just as we see some hope for the commercial and recreational fishing industries that depend on wild Califor­nia salmon, a new threat is looming — not from dams, or sedimentation, or loss of habitat, but from a CanadianCorporation called AquaBounty which has invented a genetically engi­neered (“GE”) fish that crosses growth-hormone genes from an ocean pout with a Chinook salmon to dramatically increase the speed and size of the salmon’s growth.

For the past decade, AquaBounty has been trying to secure approval from the federal Food and Drug Administration to market and sell its proprietary GE fish as “salmon” in supermar­kets and restaurants through­out
 the United States. If approved, it would be the first GE animal permitted for sale for human consump­tion.

Not surprisingly, this has sparked controversy and strong concerns from the sci­entific, environmental and consumer rights communi­ties. One concern is that if the GE salmon escaped its pens, it could have devastat­ing effects on wild salmon stocks. Another is that selling the GE fish as “salmon” would confuse consumers and undermine prices for the commercial salmon fishing industry.

Despite the controversy, the FDA and the U.S. Depart­ment of Agriculture are working overtime to help AquaBounty. The USDA recently granted $500,000 to AquaBounty to do further research to perfect the engi­neered
 fish. This is on top of previous federal grants, now totaling nearly $3 million, to support the research and development of AquaBoun-t­y’s GE salmon.

The latest grant comes despite the introduction of an amendment by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, to the 2012 Agriculture Appropria­tions bill that would prohibit the FDA from using its fund­ing to approve the applica­tion for GE salmon, and a similar amendment by Rep.

Lynn Woolsey, D-Petaluma, and Rep. Don Young, R-Alas­ka (supported by Rep. Mike Thompson) that passed the House of Representatives earlier this year. Until this legislation gets approved by the full House and Senate and signed by the president, federal agencies can continue to dole out public money to AquaBounty, so that is what
 they have decided to do.

Wild Pacific salmon are a critical natural, cultural and economic resource for Cali­fornia and other Northwest states. Yet many salmon runs in California and the Pacific Northwest have gone extinct, and many more are at risk of extinction. And just last month, a lethal and conta­gious salmon infection origi­nating from farmed salmon was found in wild salmon in the Pacific Northwest, stirring concern that neighboring salmon populations, includ­ing here in California, could be vulnerable to infection.

There is a dire need for research to protect our wild salmon populations, and $3 million could certainly help.

Unfortunately, the FDA seems bent on not only sub­sidizing but approving AquaBounty’s GE salmon application. That approval will affect Californians’ con­sumer confidence and their pocketbooks, and it could devastate our commercial salmon fishing industry.

Consumers would have no way to tell whether the “salmon” they purchase is genetically engineered. That’s because the federal govern­ment is not requiring AquaBounty to label its product.

This is why I wrote Assem­bly Bill 88, which requires a label on all GE salmon sold in California — just as Alas­ka law currently requires —
 so that consumers can make informed choices. Frankly, if California was not federally pre-empted from doing so, I would introduce legislation, similar to the Murkowski/Woolsey/Young amendments, to ban GE salmon. Short of that, we should at least make sure GE salmon is properly labeled so that consumers know what they are getting.

Our government should not be underwriting the busi­ness activities of private cor­porations like AquaBounty, especially in light of the pending application for FDA approval and the controversy and environmental risk posed by GE salmon. Here in Cali­fornia, requiring proper labeling of this dubious prod­uct is the best we can do.

AB 88 will be heard in Jan­uary when the Assembly reconvenes for session. Please write to members of the Assembly Appropriations Committee and urge them to approve AB 88, or contact my office at 415-479-4920 for information on how you can help ensure passage of this important legislation.
 

Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, chairs the Assembly Water, Parks & Wildlife Commit­tee and is a candidate for the newly created 2nd Congression­al District along the North Coast.
 

 

Read Original Article  

 

Aldaron's Walkabout

Details
Heidi Walters, North Coast Journal
Latest
Created: 05 January 2012

A journey along Humboldt Bay to see where the ocean might come in

1/5/12 [excerpts]

 

In May 2011, Aldaron Laird set out to explore the entire 105-mile perimeter of Humboldt Bay and its three major sloughs. Keeping the tides’ peculiar hours, he launched his little white kayak from dozens of locations, sometimes negotiating slippery slopes and thick brambles. He walked tirelessly, squishing through mud and teetering along rock-tumbled barriers. Frequently he paused, put down his pack, and pulled out digitized maps to ink in adjustments. He shot thousands of photos.

His mission: Record the current conditions of the bay shoreline and sloughs and determine where it is vulnerable to inundation, either from erosion combined with super high “king” tides or from sea level rise driven by long-term climate change. He had been awarded a $33,000 grant from the California Coastal Conservancy for what he had hoped would be mostly a tranquil wander by kayak. That’s not quite how it turned out.

As he travels the bay, Laird has been fine-tuning the details of what he already knows: that 80 to 90 percent of the shoreline is artificial, altered by human endeavor — earthen dikes and railroad beds, roads, rip-rapped low walls and other structures; and that only 10 percent of the native salt marsh remains, some of it growing on artificially altered shore. Laird has been noting where human structures could be inundated. He also wants to know where existing salt marsh has room to migrate inland as sea level rises and where it might drown because something — most likely a human development — is in the way.

 

 

“So far, an awful lot of the entire shoreline is really low,” Laird says. “Particularly the railroad beds and a lot of the dikes. And some bridges. The state is saying to prepare for four-and-a-half feet — 55 inches — of sea-level rise by 2100. Very little around Humboldt Bay can withstand that. If we don’t put the planning effort in now, we’re going to have trouble by 2050.”

Before traveling Humboldt Bay’s shoreline, Laird spent part of 2010 studying maps dating back to 1870 and aerial photos shot between 1948 and 2009. Using the 2009 aerial photos, Laird and his partner in the project, Brian Powell, a GIS specialist at McBain and Trush, Inc., in Arcata, made a master map. On it they marked segments showing different shoreline features — natural, artificial, exposed, vegetated, salt marsh, dike, railroad, and so on. On his walkabout, Laird had to verify, or correct, those delineations along every inch of shoreline. Ground-truthing, they call it. After that, Powell would apply the adjustments, add surface elevations, and construct a final map.

In 2008, California’s governor ordered all state agencies planning construction projects in low-lying coastal zones to take into account projected sea-level increases of 16 inches by the year 2050 and 55 inches by 2100. More to the point, the California Coastal Commission won’t permit a project around Humboldt Bay if the developer can’t prove it can handle a three-foot sea level rise now, minimum, and a six-foot-level rise, maximum, by 2100, says Laird.

Arcata’s marsh/wastewater treatment plant would be at risk of inundation, given enough sea-level rise; relocating it would mean also redoing the sewage and stormwater lines. Pastures around the bay might become salt marsh again if their old, earthen dikes, already crumbling in many places, aren’t bolstered. In fact, said Laird, a lot of ranchers, seeing the inevitable, have been selling their land to the Humboldt Bay National Wildlife Refuge or to the government. Restoration efforts to bring back some natural, tidally influenced systems are under way, including a new estuary at the mouth of Jacoby Creek and another at Salmon Creek, whose once-salmon-choked waters were diked and tide-gated by ranchers.

 

Laird hopes that when people see his data, and his and Powell’s final map, they’ll be inspired to do much more. And quickly. During a king high tide Laird has seen the rookery and the Tuluwat village site on Indian Island floating on open water, with all of the surrounding salt marshes submerged. He’s seen the bay flood right up to the top of the railroad tracks near Arcata and to the lip of a dike on Gannon Slough. “Just a little bit more and it will spill over and into the fields and highway,” he said.

“I think [the idea] is so big, people just don’t want to deal with it,” Laird said, sitting in his Arcata office one day in early December. One of the pelican skeletons he’d found lay thinly on a bookshelf. “Look at Caltrans — they’re spending millions to rebuild the 101 corridor, and yet they’re not putting it on a causeway. Maybe they should be. When I’m out there walking around those places, or kayaking, I try to imagine the scale of the impact. And I think, who’s going to hold the ocean back?”

 

This new project had desk work, too. But Laird imagined that he’d spend much of his time in the field skimming along happily in his little white Dagger kayak. Besides the serious work at hand — the mapping — he was charmed by the notion he might be the first person to consciously cover every inch of bay and slough shoreline, shooting evocative photographs and scouting out potential new kayak launch sites while he was at it.

Instead his journey, now nearly completed, turned out to be a bit more of a slog — on foot, through mud, weeds and occasional filth. Mostly he had to go out at low tide, because he needed to see the shoreline exposed to be able to tell its nature and condition. He ended up hiking two-thirds of the 105 miles. The rest he mostly kayaked, although he sometimes took the Humboldt Baykeeper boat to inventory the industrial shoreline around Eureka. Occasionally, he had to be innovative. When he needed to get to a far southern portion of bay shoreline, up against a steep bluff encased by private property, he ventured out at low tide in a deep channel cutting through South Bay’s mudflats — it was there he saw that colony of seals — then, as the tide began to rise, bringing with it the shrieking, feeding shorebirds, he paddled toward the bluff and back along the shoreline.

Through it all, Laird has gathered a unique collection of encounters and visions that probably no one else can lay claim to. He has wandered every edge and sometimes the middle of that alien world that shimmers between our dwellings and the great, roaring ocean.

 

Read Full Article 

 

 

 

More Articles …

  1. California Flood Plan Calls For $17B in Levee Repairs
  2. Environmentalists hope to turn the tide against use of sea walls
  3. Dead Minke whale found near Bolinas
  4. Making the Case for the Value of Environmental Rules
Page 131 of 170
  • Start
  • Prev
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • Next
  • End

Advanced Search

Current Projects

  • Mercury in Local Fish & Shellfish
  • Nordic Aquafarms
  • Offshore Wind Energy
  • Sea Level Rise
  • 101 Corridor
  • Billboards on the Bay
  • Dredging
  • Advocacy in Action
  • Our Supporters
Report A Spill
California Coastkeeper
Waterkeeper Alliance
Copyright © 2025 Humboldt Waterkeeper. All Rights Reserved.