12/21/11

Aan angler who has fished North Coast salmon streams for many years, I’m pleased that we are having relatively strong salmon returns this year. If nature cooperates with normal rainfall and good ocean conditions, and if we continue to invest in habi­tat restoration, we should see a meaningful improvement to our beleaguered salmon populations in the next few years. For the North Coast, that means more than just good news for the environ­ment; it means jobs.

But just as we see some hope for the commercial and recreational fishing industries that depend on wild Califor­nia salmon, a new threat is looming — not from dams, or sedimentation, or loss of habitat, but from a CanadianCorporation called AquaBounty which has invented a genetically engi­neered (“GE”) fish that crosses growth-hormone genes from an ocean pout with a Chinook salmon to dramatically increase the speed and size of the salmon’s growth.

For the past decade, AquaBounty has been trying to secure approval from the federal Food and Drug Administration to market and sell its proprietary GE fish as “salmon” in supermar­kets and restaurants through­out
 the United States. If approved, it would be the first GE animal permitted for sale for human consump­tion.

Not surprisingly, this has sparked controversy and strong concerns from the sci­entific, environmental and consumer rights communi­ties. One concern is that if the GE salmon escaped its pens, it could have devastat­ing effects on wild salmon stocks. Another is that selling the GE fish as “salmon” would confuse consumers and undermine prices for the commercial salmon fishing industry.

Despite the controversy, the FDA and the U.S. Depart­ment of Agriculture are working overtime to help AquaBounty. The USDA recently granted $500,000 to AquaBounty to do further research to perfect the engi­neered
 fish. This is on top of previous federal grants, now totaling nearly $3 million, to support the research and development of AquaBoun-t­y’s GE salmon.

The latest grant comes despite the introduction of an amendment by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, to the 2012 Agriculture Appropria­tions bill that would prohibit the FDA from using its fund­ing to approve the applica­tion for GE salmon, and a similar amendment by Rep.

Lynn Woolsey, D-Petaluma, and Rep. Don Young, R-Alas­ka (supported by Rep. Mike Thompson) that passed the House of Representatives earlier this year. Until this legislation gets approved by the full House and Senate and signed by the president, federal agencies can continue to dole out public money to AquaBounty, so that is what
 they have decided to do.

Wild Pacific salmon are a critical natural, cultural and economic resource for Cali­fornia and other Northwest states. Yet many salmon runs in California and the Pacific Northwest have gone extinct, and many more are at risk of extinction. And just last month, a lethal and conta­gious salmon infection origi­nating from farmed salmon was found in wild salmon in the Pacific Northwest, stirring concern that neighboring salmon populations, includ­ing here in California, could be vulnerable to infection.

There is a dire need for research to protect our wild salmon populations, and $3 million could certainly help.

Unfortunately, the FDA seems bent on not only sub­sidizing but approving AquaBounty’s GE salmon application. That approval will affect Californians’ con­sumer confidence and their pocketbooks, and it could devastate our commercial salmon fishing industry.

Consumers would have no way to tell whether the “salmon” they purchase is genetically engineered. That’s because the federal govern­ment is not requiring AquaBounty to label its product.

This is why I wrote Assem­bly Bill 88, which requires a label on all GE salmon sold in California — just as Alas­ka law currently requires —
 so that consumers can make informed choices. Frankly, if California was not federally pre-empted from doing so, I would introduce legislation, similar to the Murkowski/Woolsey/Young amendments, to ban GE salmon. Short of that, we should at least make sure GE salmon is properly labeled so that consumers know what they are getting.

Our government should not be underwriting the busi­ness activities of private cor­porations like AquaBounty, especially in light of the pending application for FDA approval and the controversy and environmental risk posed by GE salmon. Here in Cali­fornia, requiring proper labeling of this dubious prod­uct is the best we can do.

AB 88 will be heard in Jan­uary when the Assembly reconvenes for session. Please write to members of the Assembly Appropriations Committee and urge them to approve AB 88, or contact my office at 415-479-4920 for information on how you can help ensure passage of this important legislation.
 

Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, chairs the Assembly Water, Parks & Wildlife Commit­tee and is a candidate for the newly created 2nd Congression­al District along the North Coast.
 

 

Read Original Article